Session cookies bypass MFA
A stolen, still-valid session does not prompt for a second factor.
Breach intelligence is decision support, not data collection. Here is what it is, why leaked credentials matter, and how it differs from traditional CTI.
Free, no signup. We'll email you a one-time code to confirm it's your address.
Breach intelligence is decision support, not data collection. The value is not in holding billions of leaked records — it is in knowing which handful of them belong to you, what they unlock, and what to do before someone else acts on them.
Breach intelligence is the practice of collecting credential and identity data that has already leaked — from infostealer logs, breach dumps and ransomware leak sites — and resolving it against a specific organization’s assets. It answers an operational question rather than a strategic one: not is credential theft a risk, but which of our accounts are compromised right now.
Modern intrusions rarely begin with an exploit. They begin with a working login. Infostealer malware harvests saved browser credentials, session cookies and authentication tokens from an infected machine, and the resulting logs are traded within hours. An attacker who buys one does not need to break anything — they sign in.
A stolen, still-valid session does not prompt for a second factor.
One personal password reused on a corporate portal turns a consumer leak into an enterprise incident.
A supplier’s compromised account is an authenticated path into your environment.
Logs are distributed and acted on in days, not quarters.
A breach dump tells you that a service was compromised at some point. An infostealer log tells you that a specific machine was compromised, and hands over everything that machine had saved — across every site the user visited. That is a fundamentally richer and more current signal, and it is why device-level context matters: one infected laptop can account for dozens of apparently unrelated findings.
Traditional cyber threat intelligence describes adversaries, campaigns and indicators. It is valuable, and it is mostly context. Breach intelligence is narrower and more actionable: it names your identities, scores them, and produces a remediation list. A CTI feed tells you a stealer family is active. Breach intelligence tells you which of your people it already owns.
Raw volume is not a risk measure. A hundred thousand customer records and three administrator credentials are not the same finding. Classification separates them:
corporate accounts on assets you operate. Highest urgency.
credentials your staff hold on supplier systems.
account-takeover and fraud exposure on your own platform.
records that match loosely but carry no organizational risk, filtered out so the queue stays credible.
An exposure programme that works looks the same everywhere: baseline the historic position, monitor continuously, triage by identity type and severity, remediate on a clock, and report in terms the business understands. The intelligence is the input; the operating rhythm is what reduces risk.
A time-boxed assessment on the domains you register — your real exposure, not synthetic or sample data, and no procurement cycle to start one.
Masked evidence by default · Tenant-isolated · Encrypted in transit and at rest · Nothing deployed in your estate